
I’ve seen a lot of criticism of Ava Gardner’s performance as Pandora, which leavers me mystified. I think she’s perfectly cast, and I think her performance is spot on. She’s not supposed to be an ordinary everyday person. She’s the sort of woman who can turn down a marriage proposal by telling the man that she’s already in love, but she can’t tell him who the man is that she’s in love with because she hasn’t met him yet.
This is not a realist m

I had no difficulty in accepting that she would ask something like that. And I had no difficulty in believing that the price was worthwhile. Reggie, who also loves her, pays an even hi

The movie is told in flashback, which enhances the feeling that this is a tale we’re being told, and whether we believe it to be true or not is up to us. A Dutchman (played by James Mason) arrives at a Spanish seaport in the 1920s. Geoffrey, an antiquarian who tells the story, comes to believe that this Dutchman is in fact the Flying Dutchman, condemned to wander the oceans of the world for all eternity, and who can be released from his curse only if he can find a woman willing to die for him.

It’s gorgeously photographed by master cinematographer Jack Cardiff. I loved the statuary on the beach, and they’re used to great effect to achieve the feeling of the mundane world intersecting with the world of myth and legend. It’s also an incredibly romantic film – it’s all about love, and the price we’re willing to pay for it. It’s an unusual movie, but if you accept it on its own terms it really is a magical one. I loved it.
Pandora and the Flying Dutchmanis available on DVD, and is about to be released on Blu-Ray (if you don’t mind paying the extortionate prices being asked by Kino).
I fell in love with James Mason when I was maybe eight years old and saw him in this film. He was always magical. Completely forgot Gardner was in it, till now, but she was never particularly memorable. She wasn’t much of an actress.
ReplyDeleteBut the movie is very romantic and in keeping with the other romantic epics and the dashing heroes of that era - especially Stewart Granger’s costume pictures. He was the best of the sword fighting and bullfighting and safari hunting and mounted horseman crowd, and remained my heartthrob forever after. No one was ever handsomer, before or since.
But this movie is worth a look, if only for the nostalgia value of remembering romance when we all chased after it and believed it was all possible.
Cardiff was a wonderful cinematographer, and he captures it all perfectly.
Yes, from the 1920s to the 1950s was the great age of cinematic romance.
DeleteI'm a Stewart Granger fan as well.
I loved this film as a child and it’s still fascinating. I thought at first that the actor playing Gardner’s bullfighter love interest might be Luis Miguel Dominguín, the bullfighter with whom she did indeed have a love affair, but this actor wasn’t quite as handsome as Dominguín, although a skilled professional matador, if not as skilled an actor.
ReplyDeleteJames Mason never fails to amaze and entrance and he’s the main reason to watch this film again. No one else in it is worthy of interest and Gardner’s acting is as usual rather cringe-worthy but the movie is romantic and nostalgic and beautifully photographed by one of the world’s best cinematographers, Jack Cardiff.
There were many great charismatic actors but yes, James Mason had a special kind of charisma. We don't have stars like that today.
Delete